In today’s America, where right and left are bookcases holding in between the official story of 9/11, it becomes all the more pertinent for one to separate the real scholars from the Timothy Leary’s of the degreed and doctored world where it concerns the science of 9/11 truth. Richard Gage has done this by adhering to tried and true, traditional scientific methods, you know, the old fashioned way, or in the words of Richard Gage, “The scientific method requires us to look at all the available evidence and then assess various explanations for their ability to account for the evidence. At some point, the inferior explanations must be discarded if there is to be continued progress in an investigation, just as in pure science.”
But, everyone loves a good mystery, right? We enjoy intrigue and the more thrilling the better, but when we as individuals, vetting reality, favor intrigue over factual evidence we can do our fellow-man a disservice. At times our love of intrigue may involve innocent speculation but the effects, in some cases, of wild speculation can be immeasurably harmful, in this case it’s cost may be unfathomably damaging to a movement of citizens seeking the truth who get caught up in the snares of conspiracy theories as opposed to the science of conspiracy fact.
I’m referring here to the conspiracy theories posed by Judy Wood as opposed to the conspiracy facts researched and documented by the architects, engineers, physicists, chemists, and other scientists, experts, and scholars associated with and supportive of the organization Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, www.ae911truth.org .
I’m grateful that AE911Truth has conclusively answered the outrageous charges that Wood and her followers make in opposition to the sound science promoted by AE911Truth ; the outlandish speculations made by Wood might even be thought of as those of a provocateur but I certainly won’t go as far as to speculate on that.
Read for yourself: