Were the chemists and physicists, who studied and discovered nanothermite permeates the dust of 9/11, old men with too much time to spend on the web? Was Richard Gage AIA, of www.ae911truth.org who was an architect in his prime, working on a large project in San Francisco during the time when he began to wake up to the science of 9/11 truth, an old man spending too much time surfing the web? Are the professors, the scholars, the scientists, the architects, or the engineers who make up the educated and professional body of 9/11 truth, old men who spend too much time on the web?
Jonathan Kay, an author who professes to trust the official story about 9/11, who professes to trust the 9/11 Commission Report, that selfsame report which the very architects of, the very co-chairs of , have since claimed is full of holes and who have also since claimed they were lied to, by officials, during the investigation of, has written a hit piece about the scholars of the 9/11 truth movement and has characterized these scholars as aging men who spend too much time on the web.
He couldn’t come up with anything better than that? He certainly couldn’t dispute the science, he certainly couldn’t debate the scholars on facts, he certainly couldn’t dispute the findings of an international team of scientists who discovered nanothermite in the dust of 9/11, he certainly couldn’t explain the fall of Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper which fell at near free fall speed against the path of most resistance, having been wholly excluded from the 9/11 Commission Report, so what’s left? A lame characterization.
They are running out of options folks, when the science can’t be disputed, what’s left other than grasping characterizations and name calling?
The scholars are winning.
See for yourself: